http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrar ... mbiosis_01
Het weze duidelijk dat de claim van sommige IDC-ers ( en post-moderne amateur bioloog en ouweneel- adept Peter Scheele ) dat "er geen "nieuwe" genetische informatie kan onstaan " door de endosymbiose- theorie voor het eerst ( naast vele andere ondertussen ontdekte tegenvoorbeelden van genen-aangroei )doelteffend is beantwoord ....
In 1966, microbiologist Kwang Jeon was studying single-celled organisms called amoebae, when his amoebae communities were struck by an unexpected plague: a bacterial infection. Literally thousands of the tiny invaders — named x-bacteria by Jeon — squeezed inside each amoeba cell, causing the cell to become dangerously sick. Only a few amoebae survived the epidemic.
The blob-like form of an amoeba
However, several months later, the few surviving amoebae and their descendents seemed to be unexpectedly healthy. Had the amoebae finally managed to fight off the x-bacterial infection? Jeon and his colleagues were surprised to find that the answer was no — the x-bacteria were still thriving inside their amoebae hosts, but they no longer made the amoebae sick. There were more surprises when Jeon used antibiotics to kill the bacteria inside an amoeba — the host amoeba also died! The amoebae could no longer live without their former attackers. Jeon discovered that this was because the bacteria make a protein that the amoebae need to survive. The nature of the relationship between the two species had changed entirely: from attack and defense to cooperation.
Zie over endosymbiose
(6 artikels en vele links )
http://groups.msn.com/evodisku/glose.ms ... 273&CDir=1
Over prof L. Margulis
http://groups.msn.com/evodisku/gloss.ms ... essage=860
waarbij de creationisten, terecht belachelijk worden gemaakt!](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif "Brick wall"){kind=small}
.