Engelse rechter nu ook lid van HAMAS?
Geplaatst: 09 aug 2010 11:12
(Voor de HAMAS-fellowtravelers alhier deel II)
In Engeland is een actiegroep vrijgesproken van schadevergoeding voor vernieling in een fabriek van F16-onderdelen die mogelijk ook door Israël gebruikt worden door manipulatieve uitspraken van de rechter en door vreemde kronkels in het rechtssysteem aldaar. Deze aanmoediging van terreur en sabotage in onze EU belooft wat voor de toekomst.
Let ook op de belachelijke verdediging: men probeerde te ontkennen dat die onderdelen naar Israël gaan.
http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs ... don/324616
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/ju ... -acquitted
http://hoeiboei.blogspot.com/2010/08/is ... terse.html
A group of activists who broke into an arms factory near Brighton last year and caused damage costing around £180,000 ($275,000) were found not guilty last week of causing criminal damage.
In a lawsuit filed in October, seven British activists claimed they were legally justified to break in and sabotage the factory of EDO MBM Technology near Brighton, on the south coast of England, in January 2009, at the time of Operation Cast Lead.
Believing that the company was violating export license regulations and sending arms components to Israel, the activists, from a group called Smash EDO, said they wanted to “slow down” the manufacture of components that were allegedly being sold to the Jewish state.
The protesters threw computers and file cabinets out of the factory windows and smashed machinery using hammers, claiming they were seeking to prevent “Israeli war crimes in Gaza.”
The seven admitted breaking in and causing the damage but were acquitted when the jury found them not guilty of conspiring to cause criminal damage, despite video-taped interviews of the activists that outlined their intention to cause criminal damage and “smash up” the factory.
The activists used the “lawful excuse” defense – committing an offense to prevent what they say was a more serious crime because EDO was “complicit in war crimes.”
Judge George Bathurst-Norman told the jury: “You may well think that hell on earth would not be an understatement of what the Gazans suffered in that time.”
In Engeland is een actiegroep vrijgesproken van schadevergoeding voor vernieling in een fabriek van F16-onderdelen die mogelijk ook door Israël gebruikt worden door manipulatieve uitspraken van de rechter en door vreemde kronkels in het rechtssysteem aldaar. Deze aanmoediging van terreur en sabotage in onze EU belooft wat voor de toekomst.
Let ook op de belachelijke verdediging: men probeerde te ontkennen dat die onderdelen naar Israël gaan.
http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs ... don/324616
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/ju ... -acquitted
http://hoeiboei.blogspot.com/2010/08/is ... terse.html
A group of activists who broke into an arms factory near Brighton last year and caused damage costing around £180,000 ($275,000) were found not guilty last week of causing criminal damage.
In a lawsuit filed in October, seven British activists claimed they were legally justified to break in and sabotage the factory of EDO MBM Technology near Brighton, on the south coast of England, in January 2009, at the time of Operation Cast Lead.
Believing that the company was violating export license regulations and sending arms components to Israel, the activists, from a group called Smash EDO, said they wanted to “slow down” the manufacture of components that were allegedly being sold to the Jewish state.
The protesters threw computers and file cabinets out of the factory windows and smashed machinery using hammers, claiming they were seeking to prevent “Israeli war crimes in Gaza.”
The seven admitted breaking in and causing the damage but were acquitted when the jury found them not guilty of conspiring to cause criminal damage, despite video-taped interviews of the activists that outlined their intention to cause criminal damage and “smash up” the factory.
The activists used the “lawful excuse” defense – committing an offense to prevent what they say was a more serious crime because EDO was “complicit in war crimes.”
Judge George Bathurst-Norman told the jury: “You may well think that hell on earth would not be an understatement of what the Gazans suffered in that time.”