Alle films die hierover gemaakt zijn... alle gedachtes die hier aan vooraf gegaan zijn....
Zou het Ooit mogelijk zijn inderdaad AI te creeren? En zo ja, hoe zouden wij wel ooit met hun om moeten gaan? Moeten wij hun dan dezelfde rechten toekennen als andere mensen? Wie moet het werk doen waar wij te lui voor zijn? Wat wij niet.... "Willen doen!"
De AI kan of de grootste uitvinding van de mensheid zijn, of diens ondergang...
A.I.
Moderator: Moderators
Laten we eerst maar eens antwoord geven op de vraag wat 'intelligentie' precies is. Daarna kunnen we met vrij grote zekerheid antwoorden of we dat wel of niet kunnen maken.
I think, and ever shall think, that it cannot be wrong to defend one's opinions with arguments, founded upon reason, without employing force or authority. ---Niccolò Machiavelli
Een pragmatische definitie van intelligentie zou kunnen zijn dat elke 'entiteit' die de Turing-test kan doorstaan, intelligent is.cymric schreef:Laten we eerst maar eens antwoord geven op de vraag wat 'intelligentie' precies is. Daarna kunnen we met vrij grote zekerheid antwoorden of we dat wel of niet kunnen maken.
Ni dieu, ni maître.
Intelligente, Computers die bijvoorbeeld een bewustzijn hebben. ( heel cliché, ik weet het. Maar TOCH )
Wij zullen het waarschijnlijk niet meemaken dat dit gebeurt maar dit zou inderdaad de ondergang van de mensheid kunnen betekenen. Als dit zo zou zijn, dan zou religie een pracht van een kans hebben om zijn macht te tonen. Laat god ons dan maar eens redden.
Wij zullen het waarschijnlijk niet meemaken dat dit gebeurt maar dit zou inderdaad de ondergang van de mensheid kunnen betekenen. Als dit zo zou zijn, dan zou religie een pracht van een kans hebben om zijn macht te tonen. Laat god ons dan maar eens redden.
Ik hoop dat die AI er dan ook een AS bij heeft, want als die net zo onderhevig is aan een 'herseninfact' als de meeste (alle?) grote systemen waar ik mee heb gewerkt, dan gaat bij gebrek aan een AS die AI binnen no time ten onder aan de 'herseninfacts' van hangups en co.
Open wel nieuwe ethische perspectieven over euthenasie en de stekker er uittrekken.........
Open wel nieuwe ethische perspectieven over euthenasie en de stekker er uittrekken.........
Iets is, zelfs als het 'niet' is.
Veronderstel dat deze AI bewustzijn heeft moeten er dan ook rechten voor gaan gelden?
Robotic age poses ethical dilemma
In Pictures: Robot menagerie
An ethical code to prevent humans abusing robots, and vice versa, is being drawn up by South Korea.
The Robot Ethics Charter will cover standards for users and manufacturers and will be released later in 2007.
It is being put together by a five member team of experts that includes futurists and a science fiction writer.
The South Korean government has identified robotics as a key economic driver and is pumping millions of dollars into research.
"The government plans to set ethical guidelines concerning the roles and functions of robots as robots are expected to develop strong intelligence in the near future," the ministry of Commerce, Industry and Energy said.
Ethical questions
South Korea is one of the world's most hi-tech societies.
Citizens enjoy some of the highest speed broadband connections in the world and have access to advanced mobile technology long before it hits western markets.
The government is also well known for its commitment to future technology.
ASIMOV'S LAWS OF ROBOTICS
A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law
A recent government report forecast that robots would routinely carry out surgery by 2018.
The Ministry of Information and Communication has also predicted that every South Korean household will have a robot by between 2015 and 2020.
In part, this is a response to the country's aging society and also an acknowledgement that the pace of development in robotics is accelerating.
The new charter is an attempt to set ground rules for this future.
"Imagine if some people treat androids as if the machines were their wives," Park Hye-Young of the ministry's robot team told the AFP news agency.
"Others may get addicted to interacting with them just as many internet users get hooked to the cyberworld."
Alien encounters
The new guidelines could reflect the three laws of robotics put forward by author Isaac Asimov in his short story Runaround in 1942, she said.
Key considerations would include ensuring human control over robots, protecting data acquired by robots and preventing illegal use.
Other bodies are also thinking about the robotic future. Last year a UK government study predicted that in the next 50 years robots could demand the same rights as human beings.
The European Robotics Research Network is also drawing up a set of guidelines on the use of robots.
This ethical roadmap has been assembled by researchers who believe that robotics will soon come under the same scrutiny as disciplines such as nuclear physics and Bioengineering.
A draft of the proposals said: "In the 21st Century humanity will coexist with the first alien intelligence we have ever come into contact with - robots.
"It will be an event rich in ethical, social and economic problems."
Their proposals are expected to be issued in Rome in April
(BBC news)
Robotic age poses ethical dilemma
In Pictures: Robot menagerie
An ethical code to prevent humans abusing robots, and vice versa, is being drawn up by South Korea.
The Robot Ethics Charter will cover standards for users and manufacturers and will be released later in 2007.
It is being put together by a five member team of experts that includes futurists and a science fiction writer.
The South Korean government has identified robotics as a key economic driver and is pumping millions of dollars into research.
"The government plans to set ethical guidelines concerning the roles and functions of robots as robots are expected to develop strong intelligence in the near future," the ministry of Commerce, Industry and Energy said.
Ethical questions
South Korea is one of the world's most hi-tech societies.
Citizens enjoy some of the highest speed broadband connections in the world and have access to advanced mobile technology long before it hits western markets.
The government is also well known for its commitment to future technology.
ASIMOV'S LAWS OF ROBOTICS
A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law
A recent government report forecast that robots would routinely carry out surgery by 2018.
The Ministry of Information and Communication has also predicted that every South Korean household will have a robot by between 2015 and 2020.
In part, this is a response to the country's aging society and also an acknowledgement that the pace of development in robotics is accelerating.
The new charter is an attempt to set ground rules for this future.
"Imagine if some people treat androids as if the machines were their wives," Park Hye-Young of the ministry's robot team told the AFP news agency.
"Others may get addicted to interacting with them just as many internet users get hooked to the cyberworld."
Alien encounters
The new guidelines could reflect the three laws of robotics put forward by author Isaac Asimov in his short story Runaround in 1942, she said.
Key considerations would include ensuring human control over robots, protecting data acquired by robots and preventing illegal use.
Other bodies are also thinking about the robotic future. Last year a UK government study predicted that in the next 50 years robots could demand the same rights as human beings.
The European Robotics Research Network is also drawing up a set of guidelines on the use of robots.
This ethical roadmap has been assembled by researchers who believe that robotics will soon come under the same scrutiny as disciplines such as nuclear physics and Bioengineering.
A draft of the proposals said: "In the 21st Century humanity will coexist with the first alien intelligence we have ever come into contact with - robots.
"It will be an event rich in ethical, social and economic problems."
Their proposals are expected to be issued in Rome in April
(BBC news)
Wie atheïsme een geloof noemt kan tot niets bekeerd worden
The person who calls atheism a religion can be converted to nothing
The person who calls atheism a religion can be converted to nothing
@doctorwho's citaat:
Speculaties over de mogelijkheid dat over 50 jaar de "robots could demand the same rights as human beings." vind ik zo vergezocht dat ze de wetenschap onwaardig zijn. Het zijn het soort voorspellingen van "2001: a space odyssey" en dat is science fiction!
Ik ben wel van mening dat wetenschappers zich met de ethische aspecten van hun onderzoek moeten bezighouden, maar dan wel op een realistische manier. Dit nutteloze tijdverdrijf van problemen zoeken die gebaseerd zijn op natte-vinger-werk hoort enkel thuis in de afdeling fictie (tussen HAL en Marvin in)
First things first, laten we eerst de vragen stellen die ten grondslag liggen aan deze problemen. Dus beginnend bij de vraag van cymric: hoe definieren we intelligentie? en dan misschien: is kunstmatige intelligentie mogelijk?
Speculaties over de mogelijkheid dat over 50 jaar de "robots could demand the same rights as human beings." vind ik zo vergezocht dat ze de wetenschap onwaardig zijn. Het zijn het soort voorspellingen van "2001: a space odyssey" en dat is science fiction!
Ik ben wel van mening dat wetenschappers zich met de ethische aspecten van hun onderzoek moeten bezighouden, maar dan wel op een realistische manier. Dit nutteloze tijdverdrijf van problemen zoeken die gebaseerd zijn op natte-vinger-werk hoort enkel thuis in de afdeling fictie (tussen HAL en Marvin in)
First things first, laten we eerst de vragen stellen die ten grondslag liggen aan deze problemen. Dus beginnend bij de vraag van cymric: hoe definieren we intelligentie? en dan misschien: is kunstmatige intelligentie mogelijk?